如有任何意見,請 email 到wufidata@wufi.org.tw,信件將登載於【大眾廣場】。
2002/06/04
Jeff Geer
Wolfowitz Doctrine of Taiwan Status
There is a fine line between military government and martial
law. The legal distinction and exact nature of military
government is critical as it was authorized for Taiwan under
the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the Laws of War. The Laws
of War are very comprehensive, including the Laws of
Occupation, which are the (jus cogens) international laws
of several law-making treaties for governing the treaty
clauses and cessions of the SFPT. It seems that the War on
Terrorism has dredged up the defining legalities and missing
links including the West Berlin Question...plus the two
federal case rulings on SFPT cessions most irrevocably
effecting the unalienable rights of military government for
the Okinawa cession prior to 1972.
Wolfowitiz Clarifies Taiwan stance...not able to become
unilaterally "independent"
http://www.taipeitimes.com/news/2002/05/31/story/0000138340
Neely v. Henkel...legal nature of military government of Cuban
cession in 1898
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=180&invol=109
Downes v. Bidwell...civil rights of the WTO framework; doctrine
of incorporation for Henkel case
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=182&invol=244
U.S. v. Tiede, 86 FRD 227 (U.S. Court of Berlin 1979).
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).
Madsen v. Kinsella, 343 U.S. 341 (1952).
Yamashita v. Styer, 327 U.S. 1 (1946).
United States ex. rel. Quirin v. Cox (Ex parte Quirin), 317 U.S. 1 (1942).
Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866).
FM 27-10 Laws of Land Warfare
(See. Para. 354 for "One China" and Taiwan status)
http://www.adtdl.army.mil/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/fm/27-10/toc.htm
"Military Government and Martial Law" (3rd Edition, 1914)
includes extensive use of Neely v. Henkel
(eg. Para. 25, Cuban Occupational Status, etc)
http://familyguardian.tzo.com/Publications/MilitaryGovAndMartLaw/MilitaryGovernmentAndMaritialLaws.pdf
Taiwan is not officially independent nor is it part of China
at this time. Until final reunification is peacefully
determined, the supreme authority of the USA in Art. 4 makes
the Taiwan cession a self-governing dominion of SFPT military
government. The ROC was experimental according the nature of
military government but it remains the last obstacle to a
Taiwan republic or Taiwan SAR. The ROC government has been
nothing but smoke and mirrors under the SFPT and there are
"undefined" civil rights for Taiwanese until their more dejure
independence.
首頁
大事記
論壇
文化櫥窗
台灣國會
如果信件不願被轉載,請註明。感謝您的光臨與支持。