如有任何意見,請 email 到wufidata@wufi.org.tw,信件將登載於【大眾廣場】。
2002/06/22
Jim Cheng/North American Taiwanese Professors' Association
Who Is Taiwanese "Mitochondria Eve(s)"?
Brian Sykes, professor of human genetics at the University
of Oxford, UK, has narrowed down mitochondria (mt) Eves of all
Europeans to seven, namely, Helena, Jasmine, Katrine, Tara,
Ursula, Velda, and Xenia (a). Each had a different birthplace
distributed from the Near East to Europe, but they probably
all had the origin in Kenya or Ethiopia in the eastern Africa
60,000 to 100,000 years ago. In Africa, 13 mitochondria Eves
are recognized to have descended from the single woman, the
very mitochondria Eve of all humans bearing the scientific
name, Homo sapiens sapiens. She probably appeared in Africa
as early as 150,000 years ago.
What is the "mitochondria Eve?" To answer this question,
we should know a little about DNA. The DNA is a long,
two-stranded chain consisting of nucleotides, fundamental
chemical molecules. These nucleotides are arranged and
assembled in the specific order and, maintained the order
consistently from generation to generation. The assembly of
DNA molecules in toto makes up the specific genome that is
unique only to each species. Each DNA contains both coding and
non-coding sequences. Coding sequences represent active genes
that ultimately produce functional gene products, the
proteins, from which all biological functions are expressed.
By contrast, most non-coding sequences are not involved
directly in the functional gene expressions and activities.
Cellular DNA is concentrated mostly in the nucleus.
However, a small amount of DNA is also found in the
extranuclear cytoplasm, exclusively in the mitochondria (mt),
the powerhouse of the cell. Mitochondria of both female and
male cells are transmitted strictly from the mother to her
children and all descendants thereafter. Therefore, mt is
inherited maternally. Of the 16,569 DNA base pairs (bps) that
comprise each mitochondria genome, a stretch of about 500 bps
is located at a specific segment called Control Region where
the mitochondria DNA replication initiates. This is also the
non-coding (c) and non-recombining (d) regions. Thus all
mutations (e) will be preserved and transmitted permanently
to her descendants. By tracing back a particular mutation,
one can find the single matrimonial (maternal line) origin
of that mutant. In Bible, Eve is the first woman created by
God and is used here to represent the first woman to possess
the particular mutant. When a group of people who shares the
same set of mutations, they are said to have the "common
ancestry." By comparing all sets of mutants among different
groups of peoples, one can find the single mutant that is
common to all groups. The first owner of this unique mutant
represents the very mother, the Mitochondria Eve, who gave
that particular mutant to all her descendants. Consequently,
by tracing back a mutant for 20 generations up into the
ancestry, for example, one can find the very woman among a
million other contemporaries, who is entitled to be the
mitochondria Eve. Sykes was able to trace his maternal
ancestor back to one of the seven mitochondria Eves, Tara,
who probably lived in northern Italy about 17,000 years ago.
Tara was also the same Eve ancestor to the last Russian Tsar,
Nicholas. Thus, despite separated by thousands of miles, both
Sykes and Tsar once had the same ancestral mother.
Sykes' research also leads to another interesting discovery
that contradicts the prevailing "population replacement theory"
of Europeans. This theory suggests that the Paleolithic hunter
-gatherers who first arrived at Europe 40,000 to 60,000 years
ago were subsequently replaced "totally" by the Neolithic
ancient farmers entered the same Europe 10,000 to 15,000 years
ago. Instead, Sykes and his associates found that the
mitochondria genome of the Neolithic ancestor comprises only
20% of that of the extant Europeans with the rest 80% being
from the Paleolithic. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, a pioneer
in studying anthropology using biochemistry and molecular
biology, and his associates, reached the same conclusion. They
indicated that the non-coding and non-recombining regions of
the male-exclusive Y chromosome contained 25% of the Neolithic
component, whereas the remaining 75% belonged to the
Paleolithic. Therefore, evidence from both DNA data are
consistent in that the archaic European inhabitants have
retained the genomic dominance over the new arrivals, although
some archaeological evidence may suggest otherwise.
Sykes also points out that the origin of Polynesians is
somewhere NEAR the China coast in the Southeast Eurasia. I use
the bold letters for the word "NEAR" to emphasize that it
denotes apparently the territory beyond China. Likewise
whenever we see the words "southern China." we should be
careful for making sure it being the southern part of China or
south of the territorial border of China. These words when
used loosely may lead to a totally different conclusion.
Let's look at Taiwan now. Can the Austronesian Formosans
easily and totally be replaced by "Chinese Hans" in the last
"400" years that the China Centralists wish to claim? In 1624,
the Dutch first occupied and built the government on the
island, which was initially peopled by the Austronesian
Formosans perhaps more than 40,000 years ago. In 1662, the
infamous, Chinese- Japanese half-bred pirate, Koxinga Cheng
(Cheng, Cheng-Kung) and followers occupied Taiwan after they
chased out the Dutch, and begun the history of "Chinese Hans"
occupation of Taiwan. Since then it has been 340 years to be
exactly, or 60 years short of the "400" years frequently
quoted by the China centralists to exaggerate the occupation
overly. Sixty years can be translated into a period of three
generations. Imagine, in less than 57 years since Chiang
Kai-shek came to Taiwan in 1945, the "Taiwanese Hans" who
spoke "Holo/Hakka" or Japanese at the start of the period
are now speaking Mandarin Chinese predominantly. During the
past 340 years, languages commonly spoken on the Formosa
island changed from the indigenous Austronesian languages
before 1662 to the foreign Holo/Hakka by 1895, to another
foreign Japanese by 1945, and finally to the last foreign
China Mandarin. Along with changes in languages, cultures
of the society also changed. Obviously, to conclude the
genetic origin of a population merely based on languages
and/or cultures often leads to an erroneous conclusion as
indicated here in both Formosan and European cases. The
analysis of mtDNA should give an unbiased answer as to who
may be the real mitochondria Eve(s) of the Taiwanese and
from where she came. Equally likely, the Y-chromosome
haplotype study would provide credible data to reveal the
true Taiwanese origin. Based on available data so far on
the archaeology, Y-chromosome DNA haplotypes, and HLAs,
the most likely origin of Taiwanese appear to be from the
Southeast Asia beyond China with the close common ancestry
to Vietnam aborigines and the distant common ancestry to
Thailand.
(a). Seven Daughters of Eve (W. W. Norton & Co., 2001):
The Scientist, 15 (24), 1, 18-20.
(b). Non-coding means that no functional genes are expressed.
As a consequence, changes caused by mutations, for
example, are not under the direct scrutiny of the natural
selection.
(c). Non-combining means a DNA segment that does not mix with
the homologous counterpart through crossing-over. Thus
the segment retains the original linkage relation.
(d). Mutation is the change in nucleotides and bp sequences
with the least change involving only one nucleotide pair.
首頁
大事記
論壇
文化櫥窗
台灣國會
如果信件不願被轉載,請註明。感謝您的光臨與支持。